Catherine Stock - Fitness to Practise Barrister
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • MEDICAL DEFENCE
    • GMC Defence
    • GDC Defence
    • NMC Defence
    • GPhC Defence
  • NEWS
  • CONTACT
Select Page
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

by Webmaster | Oct 19, 2026 | Doctors Law

The High Court’s decision highlights the importance of clinical justification, informed consent and professional boundaries, with practical lessons for doctors and other regulated healthcare professionals. A recent High Court judgment has underlined the...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

Do you trust the GDC to reach the right fitness to practise outcome?

by Webmaster | Oct 6, 2026 | GDC, Uncategorized

Overview  Fewer than four in ten dental professionals trust the GDC fitness to practise process. Most respondents remained dissatisfied with the process and its outcome. Confidence has improved slightly, but trust remains low. The findings highlight the...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

Whistleblowing remains a significant source of fitness to practise concerns across healthcare professions

by Webmaster | Sep 23, 2026 | Doctors Law, GDC, Nursing Law

Overview  Whistleblowing remains an important route into fitness to practise investigations across UK healthcare professions. Recent data shows increases in whistleblowing disclosures across medicine, dentistry and nursing. Concerns most commonly relate to conduct,...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

The behaviours most likely to put doctors before a tribunal

by Webmaster | Sep 7, 2026 | Doctors Law, Fitness to Practise

Overview  Recent MPTS data highlights clear patterns in the types of behaviours and circumstances most likely to result in adverse tribunal outcomes. Criminal convictions, dishonesty, sexual misconduct and drug‑related misconduct continue to dominate the most serious...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

High Court warns against prolonged interim orders in fitness to practise cases

by Webmaster | Aug 14, 2026 | Doctors Law, Fitness to Practise, GDC, Nursing Law

Overview The High Court refused the NMC’s application to extend an interim order, criticising aspects of the regulator’s handling of the fitness to practise case.The judgement reinforces that an interim order cannot become a substitute for progressing a...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

GDC consultation signals a shift in early‑stage fitness to practise decision‑making — what dentists need to know

by Webmaster | Aug 14, 2026 | GDC

Overview  GDC launches consultation on new guidance shaping early fitness to practise decision‑making. Clearer criteria for assessing conduct, health and communication concerns. More structured thresholds for escalation — especially in behavioural cases. Faster triage...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

Fitness to practise data 2025: what UK doctors must learn from rising concerns and how early action protects careers

by Webmaster | Aug 6, 2026 | Doctors Law, Fitness to Practise

  The GMC’s 2025 fitness to practise data shows a system under increasing pressure. Concerns rose sharply—13,465 triaged, a 25% increase on the previous year—yet only around 3% of doctors faced any regulatory action. For most doctors, the message is not that the...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

Suspension revoked at MPTS review hearing following six-month order

by Webmaster | Jul 22, 2026 | Case News, Doctors Law

A doctor who had previously been suspended by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) has had the suspension revoked with immediate effect following a successful review hearing. The case arose from clinical concerns relating to the treatment of a single...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

Understanding disproportionate fitness to practise referrals: why doctors must act early to protect their careers

by Webmaster | Jun 29, 2026 | Doctors Law

A clear and persistent pattern has been well documented across the UK’s regulatory landscape: doctors from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who obtained their primary medical qualification (PMQ) outside the UK face disproportionately higher rates of employer‑led...
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise

Overseas fitness to practise problems can follow you home

by Webmaster | Jun 2, 2026 | Doctors Law, Nursing Law

Healthcare professionals who practise overseas should be aware that regulatory problems abroad do not necessarily stay abroad. The recent High Court decision in General Medical Council v Grajn [2026] EWHC 1157 (Admin) is a stark reminder that overseas disciplinary...
« Older Entries
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Complaints Policy
  • Compliance & Information
  • Ombudsman decision data
  • Bar Standards Board Profile
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board